The Employee Share Scheme is an integral program designed by companies to allow their employees to acquire company shares. Its inception is rooted in the ethos of recognizing and rewarding dedicated employees for their pivotal contributions to the company. Furthermore, the Employee Shares Scheme promotes the alignment of employee interests with the overarching goals of the company, focusing on sustainable growth and profitability.
A central component underpinning the effectiveness of the Employee Share Scheme is the Employee Share Scheme Rules (or Plan). This is an internal document that governs the administration and execution of the scheme. The rules serve as the backbone to ensure clarity, transparency, and fairness in the allocation and management of the scheme.
The Employee Shares Scheme Rules are usually includes:
I. Eligibility criteria
The specifics of eligibility criteria can vary greatly from one company to another depending on the goals of the program.
However, some common eligibility criteria in employee share schemes include:
1) Employment status: Only full-time employees might be eligible for some programs, while others might include part-time or even temporary employees.
2) Tenure: Some companies require an employee to have worked for a certain period before they become eligible. This could be anywhere from a few months to several years.
3) Performance: Companies might require employees to meet certain performance metrics or benchmarks before they can participate.
4) Position: Some schemes are available only to certain positions, like executives or management. Others might be open to all employees.
5) Caps: There might be a cap on the number of shares an employee can purchase or be awarded.
6) Exclusions: Former employees, contractors, consultants, or interns might be excluded. Additionally, employees on disciplinary action or those who are about to leave might be excluded.
II. Purpose and objectives
The purposes and objectives behind the scheme can range from financial to organisational to motivational. Here are some of the most common purposes and objectives:
1) Employee retention: Offering shares can act as a long-term incentive for employees to stay with the company, especially if there’s a vesting period before they can access or sell their shares.
2) Alignment of interests: When employees own a stake in the company, their interests are more closely aligned with the company’s overall success. This can lead to a more dedicated and committed workforce.
3) Attract talent: Competitive compensation packages, including stock options, can make a company more attractive to top talent. This is especially true in industries like tech, where stock options can become a significant part of an employee’s compensation.
4) Employee motivation and engagement: Ownership can instil a sense of pride and motivation. Employees might be more likely to go the extra mile when they feel like they have a personal stake in the company’s success.
5) Strengthening Employee-Employer relationship: Sharing in the company’s success can foster a stronger bond between employees and employers, creating a sense of mutual trust and respect.
III. Share allocation method.
There are various methods and criteria used to determine how shares are allocated to employees. The choice of method can be influenced by the objectives of the scheme, company culture, size and other factors. Here are some common share allocation methods:
1) Fixed number allocation: Employees receive a set number of shares regardless of their rank, tenure, or salary. This method is egalitarian and treats all employees equally.
2) Salary proportion: Shares are allocated based on an employee’s salary. Those earning more receive a higher number of shares. This method can be seen as rewarding higher responsibilities or roles within the company.
3) Position-based: Higher-ranking employees, such as executives or managers, may receive a larger allocation of shares.
4) Tenure-based: Shares are allocated based on the length of service. Longer-serving employees might receive more shares, rewarding their loyalty and commitment.
5) Performance-based: Shares are allocated according to individual or team performance metrics. This can be based on annual reviews, achievement of targets, or other performance indicators.
Many companies use a mix of the above methods. For example, a base number of shares might be allocated to all employees, with additional shares granted based on salary, performance, or tenure.
IV. Vesting period
The vesting period is a crucial concept. It refers to the period of time an employee must wait before gaining full ownership of the shares granted to them. Here are some key points about the vesting period:
1) Cliff vesting: This is a type of vesting where an employee must wait for a specific period before any of the shares vest. If the employee leaves the company before this “cliff” period ends, they forfeit all of the granted shares. After the cliff period, the shares might vest all at once or begin to vest gradually.
2) Graded or Gradual vesting: Under this approach, a portion of the granted shares vest over time, usually on a monthly or yearly basis. For example, if an employee is granted 1,000 shares with a four-year graded vesting period, they might earn ownership of 250 shares each year until fully vested.
3) Milestones or Performance-based vesting: Vesting might be tied to specific company or individual performance milestones. For instance, shares might vest only when the company achieves certain revenue targets, or the individual meets particular performance goals.
4) Vesting schedules: Companies often provide a vesting schedule, which clearly outlines when and how much of the shares will vest. It offers transparency to the employees about when they can sell their shares.
5) Accelerated vesting: In certain situations, such as a company acquisition or a change in management, vesting schedules might be accelerated. This means that shares vest sooner than originally planned, allowing employees to sell them earlier.
6) Expiry of rights: If an employee leaves the company before their shares are fully vested, they typically forfeit the non-vested portion. However, vested shares usually remain with the employee.
V. Transferability
Transferability refers to the ability of an employee to transfer or assign their rights to shares granted under an Employee Share Scheme to another individual or entity.
Most employee share schemes are designed so that the shares are non-transferable. This means that employees cannot sell, pledge, assign, or give away their unvested shares to another party.
The main reason for non-transferability is to ensure that the incentives provided by the Employee Share Scheme remain personal to the employee and to retain and motivate them. If employees could easily transfer their shares, the motivational aspect of the scheme could be undermined.
VI. Termination or Resignation
The treatment of shares in an Employee Share Scheme upon an employee’s termination or resignation is a critical consideration.
Here are some general considerations and scenarios regarding the impact of termination or resignation:
1) Vested vs. Unvested Shares:
Vested: If an employee has vested shares at the time of termination, they typically retain the right to those vested shares.
Unvested: Unvested shares are usually forfeited upon termination, meaning the employee loses the right to them.
2) Reason for Termination:
Voluntary resignation: If an employee voluntarily resigns, they generally forfeit any unvested shares.
Involuntary termination without cause: If an employee is terminated without cause (e.g., layoffs), the treatment can vary. Some companies might provide accelerated vesting.
Termination for cause: If an employee is terminated for cause (e.g., due to misconduct), they might lose both vested and unvested shares, depending on the terms of the Employee Shares Scheme.
3) Clawback Provisions: Some Employee Share Scheme include clawback provisions, which allow the company to reclaim vested or exercised shares under certain circumstances, such as if the employee violates a non-compete clause.
While the AIFC legislation provides a promising avenue for the realisation of Employee Share Schemes, it is essential to recognize its current limitations. The absence of specific provisions and regulations regarding this issue presents both challenges and opportunities. Companies keen on implementing such schemes will need to be proactive, possibly seeking expert legal guidance to ensure they craft a program that aligns with the spirit of the legislation while still meeting their objectives.
If you’re considering implementing an Employee Share Scheme and are looking for assistance, please don’t hesitate to contact me. I’m here to help you align your program with the nuances of the legislation while achieving your intended goals.
This article also available on my LinkedIn Page.
Visit my Blog to get more law related articles.